Search for: All records

Plausible inference is a growing body of literature that treats stochastic simulation as a gray box when structural properties of the simulation output performance measures as a function of design, decision or contextual variables are known. Plausible inference exploits these properties to allow the outputs from values of decision variables that have been simulated to provide inference about output performance measures at values of decision variables that have not been simulated; statements about the possible optimality or feasibility are examples. Lipschitz continuity is a structural property of many simulation problems. Unfortunately, the all-important—and essential for plausible inference—Lipschitz constant is rarely known. In this paper we show how to obtain plausible inference with an estimated Lipschitz constant that is also derived by plausible inference reasoning, as well as how to create the experiment design to simulate. 

Many tutorials and survey papers have been written on ranking & selection because it is such a useful tool for simulation optimization when the number of feasible solutions or “systems” is small enough that all of them can be simulated. Cheap, ubiquitous, parallel computing has greatly increased the “all of them can be simulated” limit. Naturally these tutorials and surveys have focused on the underlying theory of R&S and have provided pseudocode procedures. This tutorial, by contrast, emphasizes applications, programming and interpretation of R&S, using the R programming language for illustration. Readers (and the audience) can download the code and follow along with the examples, but no experience with R is needed. 

Many tutorials and survey papers have been written on ranking & selection because it is such a useful tool for simulation optimization when the number of feasible solutions or “systems” is small enough that all of them can be simulated. Cheap, ubiquitous, parallel computing has greatly increased the “all of them can be simulated” limit. Naturally these tutorials and surveys have focused on the underlying theory of R&S and have provided pseudocode procedures. This tutorial, by contrast, emphasizes applications, programming and interpretation of R&S, using the R programming language for illustration. Readers (and the audience) can download the code and follow along with the examples, but no experience with R is needed. 

The Rapid Gaussian Markov Improvement Algorithm (rGMIA) solves discrete optimization via simulation problems by using a Gaussian Markov random field and complete expected improvement as the sampling and stopping criterion. rGMIA has been created as a sequential sampling procedure run on a single processor. In this paper, we extend rGMIA to a parallel computing environment when q+1 solutions can be simulated in parallel. To this end, we introduce the q-point complete expected improvement criterion to determine a batch of q+1 solutions to simulate. This new criterion is implemented in a new object-oriented rGMIA package. 

Ranking & selection (R&S) procedures are simulation-optimization algorithms for making one-time decisions among a finite set of alternative system designs or feasible solutions with a statistical assurance of a good selection. R&S with covariates (R&S+C) extends the paradigm to allow the optimal selection to depend on contextual information that is obtained just prior to the need for a decision. The dominant approach for solving such problems is to employ offline simulation to create metamodels that predict the performance of each system or feasible solution as a function of the covariate. This paper introduces a fundamentally different approach that solves individual R&S problems offline for various values of the covariate, and then treats the real-time decision as a classification problem: given the covariate information, which system is a good solution? Our approach exploits the availability of efficient R&S procedures, requires milder assumptions than the metamodeling paradigm to provide strong guarantees, and can be more efficient. 

When working with models that allow for many candidate solutions, simulation practitioners can benefit from screening out unacceptable solutions in a statistically controlled way. However, for large solution spaces, estimating the performance of all solutions through simulation can prove impractical. We propose a statistical framework for screening solutions even when only a relatively small subset of them is simulated. Our framework derives its superiority over exhaustive screening approaches by leveraging available properties of the function that describes the performance of solutions. The framework is designed to work with a wide variety of available functional information and provides guarantees on both the confidence and consistency of the resulting screening inference. We provide explicit formulations for the properties of convexity and Lipschitz continuity and show through numerical examples that our procedures can efficiently screen out many unacceptable solutions. 

In their 2004 seminal paper, Glynn and Juneja formally and precisely established the rate-optimal, probability of incorrect-selection, replication allocation scheme for selecting the best of k simulated systems. In the case of independent, normally distributed outputs this allocation has a simple form that depends in an intuitively appealing way on the true means and variances. Of course the means and (typically) variances are unknown, but the rate-optimal allocation provides a target for implementable, dynamic, data-driven policies to achieve. In this paper we compare the empirical behavior of four related replication-allocation policies: mCEI from Chen and Rzyhov and our new gCEI policy that both converge to the Glynn and Juneja allocation; AOMAP from Peng and Fu that converges to the OCBA optimal allocation; and TTTS from Russo that targets the rate of convergence of the posterior probability of incorrect selection. We find that these policies have distinctly different behavior in some settings. 

In the subset-selection approach to ranking and selection, a decision-maker seeks a subset of simulated systems that contains the best with high probability. We present a new, generalized framework for constructing these subsets and demonstrate that some existing subset-selection procedures are situated within this framework. The subsets are built by calculating, for each system, a minimum standardized discrepancy between the observed performances and the space of problem instances for which that system is the best. A system’s minimum standardized discrepancy is then compared to a cutoff to determine whether the system is included in the subset. We examine the problem of finding the tightest statistically valid cutoff for each system and draw connections between our approach and other subset-selection methodologies. Simulation experiments demonstrate how the screening power and subset size are affected by the choice of standardized discrepancy. 

Inference-based optimization via simulation, which substitutes Gaussian process (GP) learning for the structural properties exploited in mathematical programming, is a powerful paradigm that has been shown to be remarkably effective in problems of modest feasible-region size and decision-variable dimension. The limitation to “modest” problems is a result of the computational overhead and numerical challenges encountered in computing the GP conditional (posterior) distribution on each iteration. In this paper, we substantially expand the size of discrete-decision-variable optimization-via-simulation problems that can be attacked in this way by exploiting a particular GP—discrete Gaussian Markov random fields—and carefully tailored computational methods. The result is the rapid Gaussian Markov Improvement Algorithm (rGMIA), an algorithm that delivers both a global convergence guarantee and finite-sample optimality-gap inference for significantly larger problems. Between infrequent evaluations of the global conditional distribution, rGMIA applies the full power of GP learning to rapidly search smaller sets of promising feasible solutions that need not be spatially close. We carefully document the computational savings via complexity analysis and an extensive empirical study. Summary of Contribution: The broad topic of the paper is optimization via simulation, which means optimizing some performance measure of a system that may only be estimated by executing a stochastic, discrete-event simulation. Stochastic simulation is a core topic and method of operations research. The focus of this paper is on significantly speeding-up the computations underlying an existing method that is based on Gaussian process learning, where the underlying Gaussian process is a discrete Gaussian Markov Random Field. This speed-up is accomplished by employing smart computational linear algebra, state-of-the-art algorithms, and a careful divide-and-conquer evaluation strategy. Problems of significantly greater size than any other existing algorithm with similar guarantees can solve are solved as illustrations.